RAGINGDEBATE.COM NETWORK AFFILIATE - FACILITATING CITIZEN'S POWERED MEDIA RECOMMENDED AFFILIATE SITE: RAGINGDEBATE.COM

14 Comments

Vote FOR or AGAINST comments below.
TowneForCongress.com - Dr Mike Vasovski
Dr Mike Vasovski
  • Vote
  • 5
  • 1

Good summary. Andrew Bacevich is a retired US Army Col. who is now teaching at Boston University and anything written by him is well worth the time. There are several youtubes of interviews of him that equally well get the point across. One done by Bill Moyers, is my favorite.

TowneForCongress.com - Keaton
Keaton
  • Vote
  • 2
  • 2

Nicely done.  Will be posting and spreading this fact sheet widely.

TowneForCongress.com - Anonymous
Anonymous
  • Vote
  • 1
  • 0

this is garbage. there are few, if any, primary information sources and the threat assessment done in relation to potential threats to the United States from foreign entities is too poor to be chalked up to a 2nd grader. nowhere on this website is there a discussion of the nature of modern terror from the element of state sponsors to the fact that cutting the head off the snake in this instance does not kill the snake, it behaves more like the hydra. in addition, there is no discussion whatsoever of nations that do not engage in so called "imperialism" that deal daily with acts of islamic terror such as thailand, the philippines, holland, ukraine, lebanon, egypt, indonesia, etc. this entire page is a joke, base your claims off of facts or do not make the claims at all. if i were you i would withdraw from this congressional race and do a lot of studying and work in the fields of national security and comparative politics.

  • Vote
  • 1
  • 1

"there are few, if any, primary information sources and the threat assessment"

Primary information sources these links are referenced above in the article and still work http://www.acq.osd.mil/ie/download/bsr/BSR2008Baseline.pdf   http://siadapp.dmdc.osd.mil/personnel/MILITARY/history/hst0903.pdf

Threat assessment of individual countries was not the point of the article, but the fiscal threat of the empire of bases should not be understated.

"nowhere on this website is there a discussion of the nature of modern terror" -  You can refer me to your sources, but check out my view of modern terror.  http://towneforcongress.com/platform-issues/afghanistan-war

On your point that other nations suffer from terrorist attacks - again, this is not the subject of the above article.  As I wrote, most Americans do not realize the full scope of bases and troops abroad that we have deployed.

"if i were you..."  with all due respect, feel free to follow your own advice.  It is my view that our foreign policy and "national security" views are leading our nation down the path to bankruptcy.

TowneForCongress.com - Anonymous
Anonymous
  • Vote
  • 0
  • 0

You do understand that the Muslim population has been acting aggressively against the West since its founding? Militant Islam's goal is not to just destroy Israel or removal U.S. troops from Saudi Arabia it is to establish a world caliphate and last I checked the United States is part of the world. As Ghaddafi recently said, and current trends show, there is no need for terror anymore because the Muslim birthrate will overrun the rest of the populace and then Sharia law can be established. We have to take a real stand against this threat. Islam, like the USSR, is bent on conquering the world. And they, like the USSR, will succeed if we do not make a serious attempt to defeat them militarily. If it were not for our significant increase in defense spending and our wars in Vietnam and Korea, the USSR would have conquered the world or destroyed it. It is only the optimality of our system including the significant DOD spending that won the Cold War and keeps us safe. The PRC is a dishonest and hostile state actor, they are treating us like an enemy. They have never once kept their end of any bargain we have ever made. They see us as a threat, bases or no bases, and that will, coupled with their extreme growth, makes them a threat we must counteract with investment in defense. In terms of efficiency, the free market does not do enough. NASA, DARPAnet, the development of dozens of new technologies, vaccines. The point of government is to assist the free market where its failings occur such as developing an AIDs vaccine. Israel does this and they are far in advance of us in terms of the development of new medical technologies and nano technologies that would not make money were it not for government direct investment. And on that issue, do you believe we abandon Israel to the wolves? When Islamic Jihad blew up our embassy in Lebanon what did that have to do with our troops overseas? Your argument holds no water whatsoever. They do not hate us because we are free, they hate us because were are not Muslim. There are acts of Islamic extremism that take people's lives every single day, American of or otherwise, including people that are killed solely because they are non-Muslim. 

TowneForCongress.com - publius
publius
  • Vote
  • 0
  • 0

anonymous... you are an ass

Leave a Comment
*NOTE: is our spam filter eating your comments? Become a registered user and login. Click here to learn more.